RESOURCE: Library Publishing Toolkit

The Library Publishing Toolkit examines the “broad and varied landscape of library publishing through discussions, case studies, and shared resources. From supporting writers and authors in the public library setting to hosting open access journals and books, this collection examines opportunities for libraries to leverage their position and resources to create and provide access to content.” The toolkit is a collaboration between SUNY Geneseo and the Monroe County Library System, and is freely available as a PDF.

RECOMMENDED: Data curation as publishing for digital humanists

Text and slides from a talk delivered by Trevor Muñoz, Assistant Dean for Digital Humanities Research at the University of Maryland Libraries, at the CIC Center for Library Initiatives conference. Muñoz presents an intriguing synthesis of a couple of growing trends in libraries – data curation and publishing. Data curation here is defined as “information work that integrates closely with the disciplinary work practices and needs of researchers in order to ‘maintain digital information that is produced in the course of research in a manner that preserves its meaning and usefulness as a potential input for further research.'” Muñoz argues that “data curation work would also be ‘publishing’ in the sense of ensuring quality and disseminating outputs to interested communities…By recognizing data curation work as a publishing activity, libraries would have a ‘market opportunity’ to address unmet needs in the digital humanities community.” More broadly,

Data curation as a “publishing” activity is increasingly relevant to the working lives of digital humanities scholars. Moreover, articulating connections between “publishing” and data curation is important in the context of strategic decision libraries might make and, in fact, are making about how to participate in “publishing.” Data curation as publishing is publishing work that draws directly on the unique skills of librarians and aligns directly with library missions and values in ways that other kinds of publishing endeavors may not.

RESOURCE: Nature, The Future of Publishing

Nature has dedicated a special issue of its weekly publication to exploring The Future of Publishing. The issue looks at OA publication models and arguments, features a Q&A with Robert Darnton, and highlights the role of libraries and information sciences in two articles:

Richard Monastersky’s news feature, “Publishing frontiers: The library reboot,” considers the role of the library in this publishing revolution, seeking more active engagement and integration with the scholarly research process:

Libraries are looking to assist with all stages of research, by offering guidance and tools for collecting, exploring, visualizing, labelling and sharing data. “I see us moving up the food chain and being co-contributors to the creation of new knowledge,” says Sarah Thomas, the head of libraries at the University of Oxford, UK.

  • In “Scholarship: Beyond the paper,” Altmetrics evangelist Jason Priem discusses an sea change in scholarly communication with the advent of the Internet. Of note is his description of modern certification of scholarly work, which takes in our own dh+lib review model of bringing news to the surface through aggregation, nomination, and curation:

The Journal of Digital Humanities, for example, does not take submissions; rather, it highlights the best content already published online, often pulling from relatively obscure blogs and web pages. Importantly, this selection process relies heavily on altmetrics (such as number of page views, tweets and trackbacks) as a first-pass filter before manual curation.