POST: Experimental Typesetting with Neatline and Shakespeare

“Does a jagged, unjustified border make the text feel more tumultuous and Dionysian? Would the same text, printed with a justified margin, become more emotionally controlled and orderly?” David McClure (University of Virginia Scholars’ Lab) asks these questions as part of a digital typesetting experiment using Neatline and a single Shakespearean couplet, where each each successive word is embedded within a letter in the previous word.

Neatline, the Omeka plugin developed to explore collections spatially and temporally, can also be used to annotate non-spatial images such as paintings and drawings, and new uses are being explored. McClure’s experiment follows the “structuralist notion of language as kind of progressive enveloping of words…Each exists in the context of the last and casts meaning onto the next; each word is contained, in a sense, inside the sum of its predecessors.”

POST: Collaboration Before Preservation: Recovering Born Digital Records in the Stephen Gendin Papers

Mark Matienzo, Digital Archivist at the Yale University Library, wrote a blog post for Yale’s Manuscripts and Archives Blog about ā€œthe importance of collaboration both within Yale and beyond about our efforts to preserve and provide access to born digital records.ā€ Matienzo describes how he collaborated to process the born digital records in the Papers of Stephen Gendin, a HIV/AIDS activist, through the cooperation and support of colleagues at Yale, the New York Public Library, and the Computer History Museum. Citing Ben Fino-Radinā€™s post ā€œIt Takes a Village To Save a Hard Drive,ā€Ā Matienzo affirms the necessity of cross-institutional collaboration to preserve and make accessible born digital content for the next generation of scholars. He writes: “While more and more academic research libraries … grow their capacity to work with born digital content, it is clear that we will not be successful unless we also continue to develop and leverage a strong community based on expertise, trust, and collaboration.”

POST: Genre, Gender, and Point of View

In a new post, Ted Underwood discusses a paper he co-authored for theĀ IEEE ā€œbig humanitiesā€ workshopĀ that is nowĀ available on arXiv as a preprint.Ā He also reviews some questions that arose after the paper was presented regarding the use of first-person narration and gender. According to Underwood, “The paper argues that the blurry mutability of genres is actually a strong argument for a digital approach to their history.”

If we could start from some consensus list of categories, it would be easy to crowdsource the history of genre: weā€™d each take a list of definitions and fan out through the archive. But centuries of debate havenā€™t yet produced stable definitions of genre. In that context, the advantage of algorithmic mapping is that it can be comprehensive and provisional at the same time. If you change your mind about underlying categories, you can just choose a different set of training examples and hit ā€œrunā€ again. In fact we may never need to reach a consensus about definitions in order to have an interesting conversation about the macroscopic history of genre.

 

POST: Digital Humanities at MLA 2014

Mark Sample has once again helpfully compiled a list of “digitally inflected” sessions taking place at the 2014 convention of the Modern Language Association (MLA), in Chicago. A few of interest to the library community:

Sample’s list makes up approximately 9% of the total 810 convention slots.

POST: Research Data Sharing without Barriersā€¦Get Involved?

Rachel Bruce (JISC) introduces the Research Data Alliance (RDA) by summarizing the group’s first plenary meeting that took place in Washington, D.C. from September 16-18th, 2013.

Some of the areas that the groups are tackling: metadata & a metadata standards directory; legal interoperability; data citation; a community capability model; persistent identifiers; practical policy; data foundation & terminology; big data and analytics & more ā€“ including interest groups that cover some disciplinary areas ā€“ such as agriculture and history and ethnography.

 

POST: Keeping the ā€œLā€ in Digital: Applying LIS Core Competencies to Digital Humanities Work

In an article in The Journal of Creative Library Practice,Ā Kaetrena Davis Kendrick of the University of South CarolinaĀ Lancaster places “many core activities of [Digital Humanities] squarely in the domain of modern librarianship.” Reviewing the ALA Core Competencies of Librarianship, Kendrick ā€œreveals how LIS competencies have been applied to a Korean popular culture DH project at Elon University,ā€ directly connecting librarians to successful digital humanities practice. Kendrick concludes her article with a rousing affirmation that ā€œthe ‘L’ in digital stands for us: Librarians.ā€

POST: Creating Themes in Omeka 2.0

Margaret Heller (Digital Services Librarian, Loyola University) has written a brief introduction toĀ creating custom themes in Omeka 2.0 on the ACRL TechConnect blog.Ā For libraries that already have Omeka installed, have access to the code, and have multiple groups requesting Omeka sites, creating a theme template can be a useful way to scale what your library can offer while adding a customized touch. As Heller notes, it can also be a valuable learning experience beyond working with the popular tool:

Since this was a new content management system to me, I still have a lot to learn about the best ways to do certain things. This experience was helpful not just in learning Omeka, but also as a small-scale test of planning a new theme for our entire library website, which runs on Drupal.

 

POST: Crowdsourcing Best Practices for Experimental Journals: Transparency

Drawing on her recent experience working with the Journal of Digital Humanities, Adeline Koh (Assistant Professor of Literature, Stockton College) has invited input on best practices for increasing transparency in the publication process for academic journals. Starting with ideas offered by Roopika Risam and Scott Weingart, Koh seeks to develop practices that take into consideration the following questions:

What defines ā€œmeritā€ in a field, particularly in a growing one with new paradigms competing to displace the old? How do editors function as gatekeepers, and what is their responsibility to be cognizant of their power? What are the politics involved in final editorial decisions? What are the advantages and disadvantages to allowing these decisions to rest with a contingent junior faculty member or a tenured senior faculty member? How do we account for the emotionally charged issues of racial, gendered, sexual and able-bodied structural privilege in editorial decisions about ā€œmeritā€?

POST: How Did They Make That?

Miriam Posner has crafted a useful introduction to some exemplary digital humanities projects, outlining the tools and technology used to create each and giving helpful pointers to resources for getting started with them. She writes:

Many Ā students tell me that in order to get started with digital humanities, theyā€™d like to have some idea of what they might do and what technical skills they might need in order to do it. Hereā€™s a set of digital humanities projects that might help you to get a handle on the kinds of tools and technologies available for you to use.

The post was created as part of UCLA’s Digital Humanities Bootcamp, a 2-day workshop for graduate students that took place on Aug. 28th and 29th (see alsoĀ #dhbootcamp).

POST: No Holds Barred Advice from Tom Scheinfeldt

Tom ScheinfeldtĀ shares some thoughts about how he evaluated a ā€œvenerable cultural heritage institutionā€™sā€ digital program. Scheinfeldtā€™s appraisal offers cultural heritage institutions a useful roadmap for considering what digital programs need to be successful and relevant, such as an integrated social strategy and mobile strategies. Above all, Scheinfeldt reminds us that ā€œDigital is not a revenue center, itā€™s an operating cost like the reading room, or the permanent galleries, or the education department. You shouldnā€™t expect increased revenues from a website redesign any more than you should from a new coat of paint for the front door.ā€