American Quarterly, a publication of the American Studies Association, regularly publishes digital project reviews and has shared a call for new submissions of digital projects for review, along with a call for reviewers for the journal’s digital project reviews.
From the journal’s website:
Like book reviews, digital project reviews are designed to foster a respectful and rigorous scholarly dialogue about specific subjects and methodologies. In addition, the digital projects review section draws attention to high-quality, relevant scholarship that, because of its mode of publication, may be missing the wider recognition in, and interrogation from, the wider American studies field. For the creators of digital projects, post-publication peer assessment is especially critical, since prepublication peer review outlets and opportunities are often so limited.
Anyone interested in submitting a digital project for review should refer to the AQ Digital Projects Review – Project Submission Form. Anyone willing to serve as a peer reviewer for digital projects of broad relevance to American studies scholars (with single-project reviews running between 2,500 and 3,000 words) should use the AQ Digital Projects Review – Reviewer Interest Form.
dh+lib Review
This post was produced through a cooperation between Amy Gay and Kelly Karst (Editors-at-Large), Rachel Starry and Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara (Editors for the week), Claudia Berger, Ruth Carpenter, Caitlin Christian-Lamb, Linsey Ford, Pamella Lach, Molly McGuire, Hillary Richardson, and Christine Salek (dh+lib Review Editors), and Tom Lee (Technical Editor).