RESOURCE: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

Jonathan P.¬†Tennant (IGDORE), Harry¬†Crane (Rutgers University), Tom¬†Crick (Swansea University),¬†Jacinto¬†Davila (Universidad de Los Andes),¬†Asura¬†Enkhbayar (Simon Fraser University),¬†Johanna¬†Havemann (IGDORE),¬†Bianca¬†Kramer (Utrecht University),¬†Ryan¬†Martin (North Carolina State University),¬†Paola¬†Masuzzo (IGDORE),¬†Andy¬†Nobes (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications),¬†Curt¬†Rice (),¬†B√°rbara R.¬†L√≥pez (Asesora Producci√≥n Cient√≠fica),¬†Tony¬†Ross-Hellauer (Graz University),¬†Susanne¬†Sattler (Imperial College London),¬†Paul¬†Thacker (independent journalist), and Marc¬†Vanholsbeeck (Universit√© Libre de Bruxelles) have made their paper, “Ten myths around open scholarly publishing,” available through PeerJ Preprints.

From the abstract:

The changing world of scholarly communication and the emergence of ‚ÄėOpen Science‚Äô or ‚ÄėOpen Research‚Äô has brought to light a number of controversial and hotly-debated topics. Yet, evidence-based rational debate is regularly drowned out by misinformed or exaggerated rhetoric, which does not benefit the evolving system of scholarly communication. The aim of this article is to provide a baseline evidence framework for ten of the most contested topics, in order to help frame and move forward discussions, practices and policies. We address preprints and scooping, the practice of copyright transfer, the function of peer review, and the legitimacy of ‚Äėglobal‚Äô databases. The presented facts and data will be a powerful tool against misinformation across wider academic research, policy and practice, and may be used to inform changes within the rapidly evolving scholarly publishing system.

These “ten most contested topics” include questions around research being “scooped,” predatory publishers, and copyright issues.

dh+lib Review

This post was produced through a cooperation between Megan Adams and Susanne Pichler, (Editors-at-large for the week), Caitlin Christian-Lamb (Editor for the week), and Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara, Linsey Ford, Ian Goodale, and Pamella Lach(dh+lib Review Editors).