Scott Weingart (Carnegie Mellon University) wrote a blog post, reflecting on his research on gender inequality in academia, particularly for his ongoing blog series on acceptances to the annual Digital Humanities conference.
Iâll cut to the chase. My well-intentioned attempts at battling inequality suffer their own sort of bias: by focusing on measurements of inequality, I bias that which is easily measured. Itâs not that gender isnât complex (see Miriam Posnerâs wonderful recent keynote on these and related issues), but at least itâs a little easier to measure than race & ethnicity, when all you have available to you is what you can look up on the internet.
Weingart closes his post with a reflection on how his research questions were formed, and the methods he chose to begin answering those questions:
Hopefully this post helps balance all the bias implicit in my fighting for a better world from a data-driven perspective, by suggesting âdata-drivenâ is only one of many valuable perspectives.
dh+lib Review
This post was produced through a cooperation between Leigh Bonds, Rebel Cummings-Sauls, Nickoal Eichmann, Leah Henrickson, Jasmine Jones, Elizabeth Lorang, Anna Richards, and Allison Ringness (Editors-at-large for the week), Caitlin Christian-Lamb (Editor for the week), Sarah Potvin and Zach Coble (Site Editors), Caro Pinto, Roxanne Shirazi, and Patrick Williams (dh+lib Review Editors).