The Library of Congress (LC) and OCLC Research have released the white paper, “Common Ground: Exploring Compatibilities Between the Linked Data Models of the Library of Congress and OCLC.” The paper, written by Carol Jean Godby (OCLC) and Ray Denenberg (LC), serves as an executive summary, published in advance of a “more detailed technical analysis that will be released later this year.”
Godby and Denenberg summarize recent activity of the Bibliographic Framework Initiative, examine the compatible linked data initiatives at both institutions, and investigate the potential uses of Schema.org framework. Key highlights of the study include:
- Work on the Library of Congress’ BIBFRAME vocabulary has advanced nearly to the point of testing its use for original cataloging, which they will be doing later this year.
- OCLC has published linked data on WorldCat.org using both the Schema.org vocabulary as well as extensions to that vocabulary defined at BiblioGraph.net.
- LC and OCLC continue to work collaboratively to identify the different use cases of these efforts and how they complement each other in a rich bibliographic universe.
dh+lib Review
This post was produced through a cooperation between Caitlin Christian-Lamb, Tara Das, Katrien Deroo, Paula Kiser, and Jaqueline Woolcott (Editors-at-large for the week), Zach Coble (Editor for the week), Sarah Potvin (Site Editor), and Caro Pinto and Roxanne Shirazi (dh+lib Review Editors).
RESOURCE: Common Ground: Exploring Compatibilities Between the Linked Data Models of the LoC and OCLC http://t.co/4mcvHpx3kp
@DHandLib RESOURCE: Common Ground: Exploring Compatibilities Between the Linked Data Models of the Library of Cong… http://t.co/DWOXtlYfrq
“RESOURCE: Common Ground: Exploring Compatibilities Between the Linked Data Models of the Library of Congress and OC http://t.co/OB4X3yEbNz
Pingback: Report: Common Ground — Exploring Compatibilities Between the Linked Data Models of the Library of Congress and OCLC | Digital Humanities Now